如果公司给配的笔记本（借给员工用）， 那么下班时间回到家，用公司的电脑写的代码归谁？

打 dota2 涨的天梯分总不归公司吧。

《硅谷》里面法官判定归公司

@xux9311 嘿嘿

肯定归公司啦

歸公司

那对于那些自己带电脑去，领电脑补贴的呢？
没道理。

@Kilerd 根据马克思说的，生产资料／生产工具 所有者是谁？

用 cloud ide 等非本地写代码即可。

The "work-made-for-hire" doctrine generally defines the relationship between a software developer and his or her client.

A segment of software code is a "work-made-for-hire" if it is either:

a) A work prepared by an employee in the scope of his or her employment; or

b) a work specially ordered or commissioned for use as [1] a contribution to a collective work, [2] as a part of a motion picture or [3] other audiovisual work, [4] as a translation, [5] as a supplementary work, [6] as a compilation, [7] as an instructional text, [8] as a test, [9] as answer material for a test, or [10] as an atlas, if the parties expressly agree in a written instrument signed by them that the work shall be considered a work made for hire. (17 U.S.C. § 101)

In either situation, the author of the code does not own the copyright in the code, as would be expected under the basic copyright framework. Rather, the person or business that employs the author or that commissioned the software owns the copyright in the code.
When a developer creates software as an employee, determining ownership of that software under the "work-made-for-hire" rule is relatively straightforward. Any work a developer creates within the scope of his or her employment is owned by the employer. Analysis of whether work is "within the scope of employment" can be extremely complex. However, at its most basic, if a developer writes a particular piece of software for work, his or her employer owns the copyright to that software.

http://asp-software.org/www/misv_resources/business-articles/who-owns-the-code/

如果公司给配的中性笔（借给员工用）， 那么下班时间回到家，用公司的中性笔写的小说归谁？

@xux9311 归公司，因为你老是使用蚂蚁的大。

归公司

那下的小片片岂不是也要归公司（手动头像）

啧，偷偷地转移到自己的笔记本上（手动滑稽

应该是归个人的 如果去租车公司租了辆车，开滴滴赚外快，收入应该算租车公司的吗？

@jadecoder 公司没让你拿到家，所以这是职务侵占，小说还是你的

@lylsh1993 我司就允许员工带电脑回家，晚上也有可能有故障要处理嘛。明文允许把公司的笔带回去倒是真没有。

我认为代码和小说一样属于智力创造，和作者使用谁的时间创作有关，如果用公司付了钱的时间，应该是公司的，如果用自己业余的时间，就是自己的。

假设，此人设计了一个巨牛逼的算法，用了一个月时间构思，一直在脑子里思考和计算，最后用一晚上把算法用 Java 实现了，这个算法的归属和最终实现它的电脑有关系吗？

所以我认为，只有代码真正上线运行了，产生用户和数据，才涉及到生产资料的问题，用谁的服务器，就是谁的。

@jadecoder 说的就是笔啊

@lylsh1993 所以这个帖子在讨论代码是谁的，而不是职务侵占